Shirt Pocket Discussions  
    Home netTunes launchTunes SuperDuper! Buy Now Support Discussions About Shirt Pocket    

Go Back   Shirt Pocket Discussions > SuperDuper! > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-01-2008, 03:17 PM
JoBoy JoBoy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 67
Any harm in using other apps during backup?

I'd like to do paying work while doing SD! backups to internal HDs and to a Time Capsule drive that I'm not using for Time Machine. If there's no harm in this, it would help me pay the rent. I couldn't find anything on this in the Users Guide and this forum, but I could have missed it. I have a new Mac Pro with four internal drive bays. One is the "main drive" with Sandbox and Macintosh HD partitions. Two other drives are used for bootable SD! copies. The fourth bay is empty. I launch SD! from the Sandbox and want to run my work applications also from the Sandbox. The Sandbox is "shared users" and NOT "shared users and applications."

Also, is there any problem using other applications during a scheduled SD! backup? Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-01-2008, 03:19 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,925
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
In general terms, you can do light work while backing up, and you can certainly back up drives you're not working on. But it's best to not back up the drive you're doing "heavy" work on.

Typically, I schedule backups for after I'm doing "paying work"... that way the work gets backed up.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-01-2008, 03:42 PM
JoBoy JoBoy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 67
[/QUOTE]Typically, I schedule backups for after I'm doing "paying work"... that way the work gets backed up.[/QUOTE]

That's my usual practice, too, but the initial backup to TC of the SystemImage went over 11 hours at a rate of less than 2MB/s according to SD! so I terminated and deleted it and went back to work. I'm using Apps in the Sandbox, but copying apps and data from the Macintosh HD to the backup drives. If I understand it correctly, I'm working from isolated apps from the same location, but also flogging the same data for both work and backups. That's why I was worried enough to make the original post. What if I first backed up the Macintosh HD to one of the other internal hard drives while not working and then ran SD! from the Sandbox to copy from the other internal drive to TC to make the SystemImage while working? That leaves SD! competing with InDesign and Acrobat in the Sandbox, but not flogging the same data location and not trying to copy the same application set. Would that help? It's this marathon SystemImage that's causing me to try to work and back up at the same time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-01-2008, 03:59 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,925
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
Perhaps use a local drive instead? Network drives are much, much slower.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-01-2008, 04:15 PM
JoBoy JoBoy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnanian View Post
Perhaps use a local drive instead? Network drives are much, much slower.
I can do that, but I was trying to get SOME use out of the TC hard drive since I abandoned TM. Moreover, TC is in a location somewhat remote from my Mac Pro. That way, I'd still have a copy even if the Mac Pro caught fire and destroyed its hard drives (a very long shot indeed). Besides, if I'm using a local drive, I'd rather drop another bootable clone in there. It's quicker and much more reliable than the image.

Is it a potential problem for SD! if I simultaneously use SD! and other apps that are also located in the Sandbox?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-01-2008, 04:25 PM
dnanian's Avatar
dnanian dnanian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Weston, MA
Posts: 14,925
Send a message via AIM to dnanian
The problem is the data you're writing, not what you're running. So, whether the application is running from the Sandbox or not, the data's being written to some drive you're using, and it sounds like you're backing that up... and that's where you can end up creating problems.

You can certainly continue to use the Time Capsule, and a Smart Update after the initial copy is faster. But it's much slower than local. It's up to you to decide how your own tradeoffs go, though.
__________________
--Dave Nanian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Server drive won't mount after backup rhennosy General 1 11-09-2007 03:49 PM
Backup failure on a certain file bmat General 3 09-25-2007 09:06 AM
Missing Fonts error after recovering from backup rcs General 8 01-27-2006 12:06 PM
(Zero-length) File caused SuperDuper to abort backup alancfrancis General 7 08-31-2005 10:42 AM
Smart Backup Error bill s General 20 02-04-2005 09:46 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.